Monday, May 7, 2012

Breaking News: Here to Entertain You Response

The blog, Breaking News: Here to Entertain You, argues that news broadcasts use too much entertainment. I mean sure the news is heavily entertainment oriented, but I don't see this as a problem. The blogger brings up the issue about how the use of entertainment takes away from the content and seriousness of news broadcasts. However, entertainment is vital in order to keep viewers in tune, which in turn, keeps money flowing in from advertisers. Having news segments be entertaining is perfectly fine as long as the broadcasters get the main points across about an important story. We don't need to know every detail about every story broadcasted, we can find out more information on our own time, if we're interested enough. If the news broadcasted all the small details in every story, they wouldn't have enough time to talk about every story that they need to get through. However, maybe these super short excerpts of the important things happening in our world are the cause of why there can also be so many excerpts of unimportant events shown on the daily news as well. 






But, then again, maybe there are just not that many big events happening in the world at all times. 






One reason I think the news publishes stories so lame as, "Mom arrested for taking 5-year-old tanning", is because they don't have any other stories to publish at the time. Therefore, they need to take whatever juicy, entertaining, somewhat interesting information tidbit and form a news story out of it in order to keep people tuned in to their news stations at all times. These little stories just spice up our lives and keep us entertained! And frankly, I see no problem with entertainment in the news as long as broadcasters portray the basics about what is going on in the world around me!

Thursday, May 3, 2012

To Skim or Not to Skim



My last blog ended on a note about how time consuming searching through and skimming printed books can be. Taking this even further I’m going to say that skimming can be a major problem that can happen in printed and electronic texts. When people start hyper-reading, which James Sosnoski characterizes as filtering, skimming, pecking, imposing, filming, trespassing, de-authorizing, and fragmenting, that is the problem. A very popular way of reading electronically is when you only read the information you are in search of. This would be using the hyper-reading ideas of skimming, filtering, pecking, and imposing. You skim the text and pick the ideas you are looking for out of it. When someone picks and chooses the words they want to read that is when problems arise. That is when the reader ends up forming their own ideas about the topic they are reading about. This is because when they are only reading certain parts of an excerpt, they are only getting a couple ideas out of it, but not the concept as a whole. That is a problem because when you only take part of an idea from an excerpt, it may not be the idea that the author is trying to convey. In fact, you could be taking something from the text that is the opposite of what the author is trying to say!


 I was skimming reviews for a good pre-workout energy supplement and I found one that sounded great. I read the first line of the review that said, “Users say this is the greatest pre-workout energy they’ve ever used!” I thought, “Perfect!” and instantly added it to my cart. Unfortunately for me, I did not continue to read the review when I absolutely should have. After taking the supplement and going to the gym without a single burst of energy I went back to read more reviews. It continued to say, “Readers beware! The company writes their own reviews for this product and there have been studies about how ineffective this pre-workout energy supplement is. You will not notice a difference in energy levels! Save your money! Do not buy this product!” After $45 down the drain and a bad workout, I learned my lesson about hyper-reading. I learned that it is important to read the entire excerpt, or at least know the authors stance on the subject matter, in order to avoid misconceptions.

I’m not saying hyper-reading is always bad, though. It can be useful especially when you already know the authors’ ideas and when you are just going back to look for specific information. Hyper-reading can be a great strategy to help you reread something to refresh your memory. And it’s a major time saver, for sure.


One way hyper-reading has saved me precious studying hours this semester is by just skimming my chemistry teacher’s power points over the main concepts of the unit, instead of going back and rereading the entire chapter in the textbook. Rereading the chapters in the textbook would take me hours, whereas reading these power points only takes a few minutes, and it helps just as much. However, I’ll only read a power point after I’ve read the chapter it is about, and I do it just to reiterate the ideas and to make the content fresh in my mind before taking a test. I would never only read the power points as a substitute for reading the textbook because the power points are not as in depth and they only cover the main ideas. This isn’t to say that I wouldn’t rather read my textbook online, however, because I would, since I like reading off of a computer screen better. Contrary to Birkerts’ belief, the online textbook would not be losing logic and concept just from being on a computer screen. Although he says, “the presentation structures the reception,” (Birkerts 122), if the books say the same thing, I would be getting the same information and concepts out of an online textbook as I would a printed textbook, thus the online textbook is the source I would go to if it were available.

Just be careful because hyper-reading is not always the best strategy when learning about a new subject, since that is when you can misinterpret what the author is really trying to say. This is what can lead to bad things, like bad workouts. To avoid problems like these, avoid hyper-reading unless you know the main ideas of what you are reading. Because of all the search engines out there, if you know what information you want to find, and you want to find it fast, electronic media will be your best friend, even if hyper-reading isn’t the main strategy you choose to use. Key words are the most important part of quickly finding information electronically and hyper-reading will just help bring you to these key words. Since hyper-reading is all about reading words, it is not letting images and impressions take precedence over logic and concept. Hyper-reading and keywords are not diminishing logic and concepts, but rather getting you to them quicker, especially with the use of Google.

Can Electronic Media Save You Time?


            Reading texts online can definitely be different than reading printed texts, and I think online reading can be much more efficient than printed reading. However, authors like Sven Birkerts, an American essayist, does not think that electronic reading is the way to go. This is because he believes that the media shift from printed to electronic texts will ultimately cause us to think that images and impressions are more important than logic and concept. I have a couple thoughts about this matter. Number one, images can add to the overall meaning of something you are reading, so they are not a problem. And number two, frankly, I don’t see how he believes that people will think that images and impressions are more important than logic and concept. I feel this way because everyone knows images just support concepts, but the written concept that the images are supporting is what we are actually getting information from.


Furthermore, Birkerts thinks that the printed text is what makes people speak more elegantly, and he thinks people who read electronic texts speak more plainly. The way I see it is words are words no matter what they are on. Birkerts continues to state his opinion about everything that is not printed onto paper as he says, ”With visual media, impression and image take precedence over logic and concept, and detail and linear sequentiality are sacrificed” (122). The piece of paper that someone would read words off of is not what is going to make it be more full of detail or linear sequentiality. No. What is going to make something detailed and logical is how it is written, not what it is written on. In fact, I see electronic texts as a way more efficient way to find details about specific subjects than printed texts would be.



Electronically, you can type in your subject and a few keywords about it into a search engine and instantly get loads of sources with many details on exactly what you are looking for. In a printed text you have to find the actual part of the text that talks about the specific subject you are looking for details on. If the text doesn’t have an index then have fun spending the next few hours just looking for the part that is about your subject. When you find the section or chapter about your subject, the fun doesn’t end! You get to continue skimming the pages looking for keywords that could potentially provide you the details on the subject that you have spent the last several hours looking for. At the end of the day, you’re going to be wishing you just typed in a few words to Google.